Competencies
Organisation summary
Average percentage score and outcome mix for each competency, across all candidates in this cycle.Candidates
14 at level 2, 16 at level 3, 6 at level 4
Conversations
36 self conversations and 426 with raters
Of nominated raters took part
Every level met its minimum of 5 usable candidates
People in the network
Candidates, raters and the colleagues they described
Planning and organising
Across all 36 candidates
Planning and organising
Candidates for whom it is a strength
Giving feedback
Across all 36 candidates
Giving feedback
Candidates for whom it is a development area
Listening
Candidates who rate themselves higher than their raters do
Every competency
Highest average percentage score first. Each candidate is assessed at their level of work.
percentage scoreOutcome mix
Number of candidates with each outcomeWhere people said it fell short
Planning and organising
74%45% too little55% too much
Analysing information
71%71% too little29% too much
Building relationships
70%71% too little29% too much
Serving customers and stakeholders
69%62% too little38% too much
Collaborating and coordinating
63%76% too little24% too much
Adapting to change
61%82% too little18% too much
Making decisions
60%59% too little41% too much
Communicating clearly
58%87% too little13% too much
Listening
55%86% too little14% too much
Creating psychological safety
52%71% too little29% too much
Setting direction
50%91% too little9% too much
Giving feedback
46%95% too little5% too much
Numbers inside the bars are numbers of candidates. Outcomes run from blind spot on the left to strength on the right.